They tell us,
sir, that we are weak - unable to cope with so
formidable an adversary. But when shall we be
stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year?
Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a
British guard shall be stationed in every house?
Shall we gather strength by irresolution and
inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual
resistance by lying supinely on our backs, and
hugging the delusive phantom of Hope, until our
enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we
are not weak, if we make a proper use of those means
which the God of nature hath placed in our power.
Three millions of people, armed in the holy cause of
liberty, and in such a country as that which we
posses are invincible by any force which our enemy
can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight
our battles alone. There is a just God who presides
over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up
friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir,
is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant,
the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no
election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is
now too late to retire from the contest. There is no
retreat, but in submission and slavery! Our chains
are forged, their clanking may be heard on the plains
of Boston! The war is inevitable - and let it come!!
I repeat it, sir, let it come!!!
It is in vain,
sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry,
peace, peace - but there is no peace. The war is
actually begun. The next gale that sweeps from the
North will bring to our ears the clash of resounding
arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why
stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish?
What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so
sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and
slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what
course others may take; but as for me -- give me
liberty or give me death!"
Patrick
Henry, March 23, 1775
Under British rule
violations of law were dealt with by constables and
magistrates. There was no ‘police force’,
so whenever force was needed to apprehend an accused
criminal, the citizenry, under the ‘posse
comitatus,’ would assist the constable. When the
citizenry would not comply, or other circumstances
warranted a larger force, the army was called. The
army had to be requested by the Governor, and
approval given by the General officer over the
troops. This was predicated on an old English concept
that the military authority SHALL BE SUBORDINATE to
the civil authority.
In March, 1775,
General Gage commanded about 5700 men with which to
provide ‘police powers’ and defense of an
estimated 3 million colonists within the colonies.
This calculates to less than 2.9 ‘law
enforcement officers for every one thousand people.
In 1991, the FBI
reported that there were 2.8 local ‘law
enforcement officers’ for every one thousand
people. This number doesn’t include corrections
officers, civilian staff. or federal alphabet
agencies, nor does it include the military, which
comprises 9.9 per one thousand. We more closely
achieve Patrick Henry’s concern of the number of
"guard[s] ... stationed in every house."
As we grasp at the
"illusive phantom of Hope" we seem
to fail to recognize that the government is more
fearful of its people than at any time since well
into the War of Independence. Congressional hearings
-- offered as an appeasement; BATF sending a warning
to all law enforcement agencies advising them to be
cautious around militia personnel (See April 25, 1995 Outpost of Freedom
release);
increased security at the White House, including
closing a portion of Pennsylvania Avenue -- in a free
country?; and, the rampant growth of militia and
common law courts -- especially since April 19, 1995.
The question arises
-- With all that is going on in the courts and with
more representatives listening to us, isn’t it
just a matter of time before we return to a
Constitutional Republic?
This is a question
that cannot be answered, until it is too late if the
answer is found to be in the negative. We can,
however, look at what has occurred over the past
fifty years (since efforts first began, in earnest,
to convert back to a proper form of government) and
we will find that there is not one single year in
which we have not lost ground in this effort. The
current year provides an excellent example. With all
of the talk about how well we are doing, we fail to
recognize that HR 97 (The
Rapid Deployment Strike Force Act); HR 666
(Exclusionary Rule Reform Act of 1995); HR 3355
(Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of
1994); HR
667 (Violent Criminal Incarceration Act of 1995); HR
729 (Effective Death Penalty Act of 1995); HR 896
(The Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995); HR 1544
(Domestic Insurgency Act of 1995); EO
12949 (Foreign Intelligence Physical
Searches);
and others, have all been submitted and are likely to
pass Congress this year (except the EO and PDD, which
are proclamations of King Bill). Each of the above
mentioned acts are encroachments upon the
Constitution, and each violates the requirement for
an AMENDMENT to modify the Constitution, which
amendment must also be ratified by the States.
Instead we have a Congress (parliament) that is
foreign to our form of government, otherwise it would
be desirous of abiding by the very Constitution which
created it.
We continue to
vainly presume that we have found an answer -- a
solution to the problem at hand. We have closed our
eyes to the inevitability and the course of those
behind the government. After 180 years of effort to
bring the United States of America back under British
domination, they are not likely to submit to these
feeble efforts of ours to regain a small degree of
control over our own destiny by returning to that
Constitutional form of government.
We must recognize
the severity of the problem, and we must recognize
that "[t}here is nor retreat, but in
submission and slavery!" Until we are able
to make the commitment that was made by our Founding
Fathers we will never have the strength and moral
courage to succeed at our task. We must accept the
conditions, as they are so obvious before us, that we
are in a condition of war with the government, of
which there is no solution save victory, or defeat.
Many have argued
that we have no chance against a force as powerful as
the us government. These same arguments permeated the
conversations of two hundred years ago as a rag tag
army, under General George Washington, first held at
bay, then began to achieve victories over the
greatest military force the world had ever known.
This victory was
achieved not by a reliance on God to fight the
battles, but on faith in God to give the Americans
the courage to fight and achieve that victory. Not by
standing idly by and waiting for God to join the
battle, but knowing that by the grace of God, the
American cause was just, and regardless of the
consequences to each individual, God’s will
would prevail and our posterity would have the
opportunity to live in a new order of the ages in
which man, each and every man, was as much a part of
the government as any other man. It will be with the
recognition of this very concept (that each man is
equal in the government) that we will again restore
the blessings of liberty to this great nation. When
Bill Clinton realizes that he works for us, and has
failed in recognizing our desires; When each member
of Congress realizes that he works for us, and has
failed in recognizing our desires; when each
administrative agency official realizes that he has a
job to serve, not to rule; and when we recognize that
we have also failed at our responsibility to maintain
a constant vigil on the actions of government --
then, and only then, will we regain those blessings
of Liberty.
The first step in
this battle is to make that commitment that Patrick
Henry spoke of nearly a month before the first
hostilities at Lexington and Concord -- nearly
fourteen months before a declaration of war was made
in Our Declaration of Independence. When each of us
is willing to commit to the concept of LIBERTY or
Death -- then we will have truly begun to achieve our
goal
[source: Orlando Sentinel World
Almanac, 1989]
Return to Sons of Liberty
Index
Go to Next Sons
of Liberty
Go to Previous Sons of Liberty