"Whereas by an Address
presented to his Majesty by both Houses of Parliament in
February last, the American Colonies are declared to be
in a State of actual Rebellion, we conceive that all Laws
and Commissions confirmed by, or derived from the
Authority of the King or Parliament, are annulled and
vacated, and the former civil Constitution of these
Colonies for the present wholly suspended. To provide in
some Degree for the Exigencies of the County in the
present alarming Period, we deem it proper and necessary
to pass the following Resolves, viz."
So reads the introductory paragraph of
the RESOLVES ADOPTED IN CHARLOTTE TOWN, MECKLENBURG
COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, MAY 31, 1775, by its Committee of
Safety. Understanding that the Committees were formed as
secondary forums because the entity created by the Crown
was also controlled by the Crown, we can see that the
people were dissatisfied with the imposition of
authoritarian rules with it's foundations far away in
England. Those governing by British authority were bound
to principles and laws established by rulers rather than
the people themselves. Even prior to the adoption of the
Mecklenburg Resolve, most communities had established
their Committees to represent the interests of the
people, not of the Crown.
Within many of the Committees were
subcommittees formed to deal with issues of importance.
The relevancy of those specifics may not apply in our
current world and state of affairs, yet to model
contemporary committees to address the issues of today
might be warranted.
Recently, in working with one community
to establish a Committee, we developed the following list
of committees from which they would begin to establish
viability in their organization. The Committee of Safety
would be comprised of the following committees:
1. Executive Committee
2. Committee of the Whole
3. Ways and Means Committee
4. Historical Research Committee
5. Contemporary Research Committee
6. Political/Judicial Advocacy Committee
7. Political/Judicial Evaluation Committee
8. Public Affairs Committee
The idea, in a desire to be truly
republican in nature, was that members of the Committee,
all of whom would be members of the Committee of the
Whole, would join no more than one of the remaining
committees, with the exception of the Executive. Then,
within each of the committees an election of a spokesman
would be made. A desire to elect comprehensive thinkers
rather than outspoken advocates (like politicians) would
be encouraged. Those elected would then constitute the
Executive Committee which in turn would select it's
chairman. Membership in only one of the lesser committees
was limited to allow the greatest degree of productivity.
If any members assigned a task were unable to complete
said task without good cause, he would be possibly
subject to removal from the committee rather than allow
glorification at the risk of productivity.
Issues submitted to the Executive
Committee would be directed to the appropriate lesser
committee. The lesser committee would evaluate and
determine if they were the appropriate committee. They
would then determine whether the issue warranted the
application of the resources and would return this
recommendation to the Executive Committee for assignment
or rejection. If assigned, the issue would be evaluated
by the assigned committee and reported back in a timely
manner to the Executive for consideration by the
Committee of the Whole.
Briefly evaluating the responsibilities
of the lesser committees, Ways and Means would be
assigned the responsibility of determining fund raising
activities or means as well as provide for material and
equipment necessary for the conducting of business of the
Committee. Historical Research would be consistent, and
supportive, of many activities being conducted by the
researchers currently exposing our true heritage and law.
Many existing organizations might encourage their
membership to participate in this committee. Contemporary
Research would attempt to sort out information regarding
issues of the day, such as Weaver and Waco, and any other
matter of importance to the community, investigating to
establish credible information and weed out
misinformation. Political/Judicial Advocacy would be the
pre-election group that would evaluate and determine
desirability of candidates and/or issues to be included
on the ballot.
The Political/Judicial Evaluations
committee would evaluate the activities of those
currently in office, or even the local media. Their
evaluations and reports would be the foundation for an
accurate evaluation of the status of our relationship
with the government which rules from Washington, D. C.
Any investigation by this committee should result in a
complete and thorough report to the Executive Committee.
It would then be submitted to the Committee of the Whole
which then would leave no doubt that the person
identified was in violation of the Constitution or
Nature's Law, regardless of how those actions related to
statutory law. If the statutory law did not exist, would
the person investigated be considered, perhaps, guilty of
a crime against the Constitution or Nature? The
information developed in this committee should be
disseminated to the entire community, by whatever means
necessary, so as to educate more than just the membership
of the Committee. The Public Affairs Committee would take
on the task of dissemination of information, as directed
by the Executive Committee, to the membership, the
community, the press and other Committees.
The Executive Committee would be
charged with the overall conduct of the Committee and
would appoint Ad Hoc committees when issues developed
that were of a temporary nature. The Executive Committee
would also charge the militia should circumstances ever
require that the militia be called into active duty. The
Committee acts as the Mind and gives direction to the
Body (the militia).
There
are some things that are worth giving for,
and the cause we have chosen is such.
If you give any less than necessary,
All that is not given is lost.