Nightline, with Ted Koppel, has chosen this evening to
review the personal and tragic recovery of those living
and dead as a result of an explosion on April 19th.
Reviewing the story of two children dug out of the
rubble, one alive and one dead, the dead child being the
object of the now famous cover of Newsweek magazine.
Interviews with the doctors who found that they had to
amputate the leg of a twenty year old mother who had lost
her two children and her mother in the explosion. The
relief and congratulations when another child was removed
from the rubble, alive, late that evening.
Ted began the program by reminding us that just 32
years ago, television audiences saw no normal programming
for five days as a result of the assassination of John
Fitzgerald Kennedy. Reviewing the scene at Dealey Plaza,
the swearing in of Lyndon Johnson, Jackie's grief and the
assassination of Lee Harvey Oswald occupied all but the
local news slot. Five days later the networks finally
returned to regular programming.
The art of presentation has changed, considerably, for
after just a couple of days, the revenue source of the
networks, programming and advertising, are back in order.
Talk shows, television equivalents of the National
Enquirer, and special broadcasts have become the means of
generating emotional grief in the audiences. They have
also become the forum for the demonization of people who
have become concerned over the more recent events of our
history that have demonstrated a change in the nature of
government. Militia around the country have become the
target of every highly paid specialist of mis-information
on every network. Somebody has to be guilty of the
tragedy in Oklahoma City, and with the alleged bomber,
Timothy McVeigh, hidden behind prison bars, the scapegoat
has become these militia. Yes, those same militia
identified in the Second Amendment to the Constitution.
I spoke with a reporter, yesterday, and expressed my
concern over the direction of coverage and the tension
that it was creating. He said that, among other matters,
he would also like some guidance in what direction should
be taken to properly cover the story. Now, we don't
really believe that he was sincere in this request, but I
did offer my thoughts on the matter. I suggested that the
networks should DEMAND the presentation of the
surveillance video the FBI has claimed to possess. The
release, and broadcasting of this video would put to rest
many of the unanswered questions surrounding the bombing.
He told me that they have asked for the video, but the
FBI has claimed that, since there is an ongoing
investigation, they cannot release it.
It was clear, by this conversation, that this simple
answer by the FBI was sufficient to allow the television
press to cast off their concern over this evidence, and
seek out yet another militia organization to demonize. It
had never occurred to them that we have been exposed to
video coverage of events since JFK's assassination, with
more recent events being the Rodney King beating,
numerous killings during convenience store robberies, and
many others acts long before the perpetrators were
identified and arrested. Why doesn't this standard apply
in the present case? Is there a reason for the press to
not seek this video, or, at least, a valid and specific
reason for the "evidence" to remain secreted
away in a vault, much like the evidence of the tragedy in
Waco?
We have been told that the video shows the Ryder truck
being parked at 8:56 A.M., in front of the Murrah
building. We have been told that two men were seen near
the truck until around 9:00. We have been told that one
of the men appears to be Timothy McVeigh, and that the
other may be John Doe #2, according to the renderings
that have been shown nationwide. What we haven't been
told is, why the government will not release this video.
Perhaps the press needs to tell the government WHY
they should release the video. There are many rumors
circulating as to how many explosions, and whether the
truck was actually the "device" which created
the explosion. There are questions as the whether McVeigh
and John Doe #2 are really the culprits in the matter.
There are probably many more questions that, when
answered, will relieve some of the tension that has grown
to extreme proportions on both the sides, the Patriot
community and the government. There appears, however, to
be no concern on the part of the FBI that they have the
means to, perhaps, relieve some tension. Nor does their
seem to be any sense of accountability by the employees
of the people to explain their reasoning for their
secretiveness.
Some other points I should have made to the reporter,
especially in light of the program tonight, are: Where
was the press as Perry Jones lay dying because he was
denied medical attention, unless, of course, he
surrendered to the BATF/FBI? Where was the press when
dozens of children survived fusillades of bullets tearing
holes in their walls, doors and ceilings, and some of
their friends bodies as the BATF attempted to serve
search and arrest warrants against David Koresh? And,
where was the press when nearly twenty children huddled
in fear, wrapped in wet blankets, and their mothers arms,
as the federal "authorities" fired tear gas
into their home, and made ripe an environment which
eventually, allowed their home to burn to the ground,
along with those children, screaming in pain as the
flames and resulting pain exceeded the hurt from the
nearly six hours of gassing? Where was the press when
some of the Davidians were held in jail over eleven
months, as material witnesses, and then never asked to
testify? Where was the press when Marjorie Thomas and
Misty Ferguson lay in bed recovering from nearly fatal
burns from that fire? Where was the press when America's
government succeeded in conducting atrocities on her
people to an extent as severe as nearly any in the recent
history of the world?
Previous article
Next article
Return to Oklahoma City Index